19 May 2015
Having (mostly) enjoyed using Angular 1.x on a couple of projects at my previous job, and using TypeScript on some side projects, I was thrilled to find out that the Angular and TypeScript guys were teaming up for the next major release of Angular.
Naturally I couldn't wait to get started with the alpha of Angular that was recently released by the team. Now that its a snap to get up and running, I had no excuse not to try it by building out the MVP of my next startup. I present to you...
There are plenty of guides out there on getting started, so I won't go into those details. Instead I want to tell you about some of the awesomeness that you can expect and some of the issues that you might run into while running the alpha.
While I do sympathise with those maintaining large Angular 1.x codebases, I think taking the time to upgrade will be well worth it.
Services that provide data to your application no longer need to be created
with the special
angular.factory function, they can simply be written as standard
ES6 classes. This means code will be much more interoperable with other frameworks
if you choose to use them. Where it felt like Angular 1.x owned your whole application,
this no longer seems to be the case in Angular 2.
Writing a component (essentially a directive with a view) now involves creating a normal ES6 class and attaching annotations for the Angular specific things, such as templating.
The new templating language is vastly different from Angular 1.x, but also vastly easier to learn. While reading markup in Angular 1.x, it could often be confusing knowing whether an attribute was an expression or a value. The new templating notation makes this blindingly obvious:
I believe a lot of the freaking out during the original announcement was due to these changes, but in reality this will probably be the easiest part to migrate.
Clearly a lot of effort has gone into thinking through the component model and how it will integrate with Web Components when they become a thing. The idea is that you compose your application with components, whether those are one-off or reusable components. While Angular 1.x had directives and controllers and the associated confusion over which one to use, Angular 2 throws that away and says just use components.
It seems they have taken a lot of inspiration from ReactJS in this sense. Although I haven't tried, I imagine it would not be much of a stretch to use Angular 2 and ReactJS components side-by-side.
Angular 2 is still very early Alpha, but it is good enough to build some working prototypes with. A few of the things that you might run into getting started now:
@Viewannotations are defined in the definitions file, while
@Injectetc are still unrecognised.
new DataStore()and use that instance without any issues.
Yes, Angular 2 is really different from Angular 1.x, but that is a good thing. Learning Angular 2 from scratch will be significantly easier than learning Angular 1.x from scratch. So if you're willing to throw away a lot of knowledge and a lot of code for the sake of sanity, I believe it to be a worthy cause.
You can find the source code to Angular 2 Googly Eyes on GitHub